Separate names with a comma.
Most people ? Really ? I think it's just a little bit more complex than that. You're right that it can be disabled, but the problem is that...
You still play it but will not recommend it ? Makes perfect sense... :p Well your perceptible degree of frustration is indicative of how much...
Honest question : will you stop playing ?
If you suppose "the core is worse" then you can't affirm "neither is safer in a combat environment" and by the way this is not how I formulated it...
Then picture this when deciding where to place the core and the extenders : would it be safer to place the core in a more vulnerable position than...
I wouldn't enjoy it more if they lowered CPU component requirements just to avoid working on the aspects I mentioned. Those pre-date CPU by a...
That's still a possible scenario, but there are thousands of other, more probable scenarios. There is also the very probable scenario that CPU...
If the NPC AI was top notch, challenging without feeling cheaty (aimbots, hacking stuff), with more diverse animations, if "stealth" was something...
Well that's a big part of our discussion here. You reacted when I wrote this: Well without extenders, CPU would be tied to the core as the only...
That is the faulty reasoning that makes your other points moot. Having a simple proportion abstracted from device CPU costs can mean anything. If...
What you and Casta are implying is a purely theoric situation that is simply not probable, and if it happens then the design is to be blamed, not...
And they still have to test every setup they come up with with as many realistic scenarios as they can, I guess. There will always be "limit"...
This scenario implies that attackers made a surgical hole in the ship and that all devices are still present when the T4 extender is destroyed....
Can it get worse this way than presently having base turrets on snooze when attacked ?
Well without extenders, CPU would be tied to the core as the only device managing CPU, so when the core is disabled the fight is over (and it's...
Spinning me in circles one more time, hey ? Just read @dpburke2 's latest post again. If you believe CPU is only about encouraging...
That's what we're saying, except for the "retracted" part because the "block" can still be targeted. If block is exposed but turret inactive, than...
I disagree, because of this : This sheds light on an aspect that has not been debated much, because for the most part players were not told that...
I was just cautious not to assume too much. But if what you mention is accurate, then it's one less "change" to code. ;) The remaining stands :...
In fact these "checks" for turrets may even be done before the turret wastes time turning towards its target, so every turret can "weight in"...
