does anyone know what this guys talking about?

Discussion in 'Other Discussion' started by The Tactician[ Λ ], May 26, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. The Tactician[ Λ ]

    The Tactician[ Λ ] Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2017
    Messages:
    1,085
    Likes Received:
    3,781
    so seems some guy on my workshop posted this idk what the hell he means makes no sense to me, can someone explain?

    [​IMG]

    ?_?
     
    #1
  2. Zyrax

    Zyrax Lieutenant

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2017
    Messages:
    10
    Likes Received:
    12
    He touches the currently known problem of 'bricks', probably. Thats just my guess because i cannot uncode the biggest part of this message...
     
    #2
  3. The Tactician[ Λ ]

    The Tactician[ Λ ] Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2017
    Messages:
    1,085
    Likes Received:
    3,781
    bricks, lol well that explains something, i made a CV miner using the new layers but have the cockpit protected for pvp space, im wondering if hes mad about this or, idk at this point LOL
     
    #3
  4. Zyrax

    Zyrax Lieutenant

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2017
    Messages:
    10
    Likes Received:
    12
    Bricks are pretty annoying. Such messages are okey because problem of bricks pisses off a lot of emp. players including me. Hope such **** will be fixied.
     
    #4
  5. The Tactician[ Λ ]

    The Tactician[ Λ ] Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2017
    Messages:
    1,085
    Likes Received:
    3,781
    ah ok
     
    #5
  6. The Tactician[ Λ ]

    The Tactician[ Λ ] Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2017
    Messages:
    1,085
    Likes Received:
    3,781
    #6
  7. michaelhartman89

    michaelhartman89 Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2016
    Messages:
    612
    Likes Received:
    1,044
    That's Gawain, our neighborhood looney that loves to be victimized.

    @Kassonnade, do you remember him and Xenophon?

    Gawain and Xenophon trolled my threads for months with emotionally charged drama and thankfully Kassonade and a few others were there to get rid of the bastards.

    Man I haven't seen him around for at least a year haha
     
    #7
    Last edited: May 27, 2018
    Starwing6 and Kassonnade like this.
  8. rucky

    rucky Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    May 29, 2017
    Messages:
    935
    Likes Received:
    2,626
    only Problem is, he's not only with the exact same message on my blueprint
    https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1394888121

    He and his friends are seeking blueprints which they believe are wrong in their sense and it also can be assumed they hit these with massive downvotes (which I got for these vessels shortly before his message) only to get the Devs a message as it seems.

    And now the funny part,
    he believed my vessel with 8 Harvesters used over-limit number of that device, which in fact is not true.
    So I got that massive trolling and downvoting even because false meaning -
    which AGAIN shows, that voting, whether positive or negative, should not only be only possible AFTER subscribing, but also at least 24 hours later, and additional any downvote (atleast) should be paired with the necessity of writing a comment!

    edit: @The Tactician[ Λ ] I think you've seen his message on MY vessel ;-)

    edit2: His opinion is, that on all "free""unrestricted" Servers PVP is biased because that guy with the biggest... uhm... number of weapons win, or better said the best Ping, because too much weapons hinder the performance and then Ping and not own skill win the fight. More or Less.
    Therefore they seek and destroy all Blueprints which have "unrestricted" (over the limit) features -> until the Devs listen and remove that feature again.
    (just check his additional messages on my blueprint)

    Whether or not PVP is biased is - personally for me - irrelevant to me.
    But what I don't like is, to get trolled and attacked (downvoted) in some sort of War against the Devs.
    So I hope, when this doesn't stop, that the Devs DO TAKE ACTION about that.
     
    #8
    Last edited: May 27, 2018
  9. The Tactician[ Λ ]

    The Tactician[ Λ ] Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2017
    Messages:
    1,085
    Likes Received:
    3,781
    this
     
    #9
  10. Zyrax

    Zyrax Lieutenant

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2017
    Messages:
    10
    Likes Received:
    12
    Just too emotional boy... It sounds like he was crying while typing it.
     
    #10
    eLLe likes this.
  11. The Tactician[ Λ ]

    The Tactician[ Λ ] Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2017
    Messages:
    1,085
    Likes Received:
    3,781
    :rolleyes:
     
    #11
  12. Kassonnade

    Kassonnade Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    May 13, 2017
    Messages:
    2,816
    Likes Received:
    4,111
    How can I forget...

    Be ready for end of school soon... We'll get a fresh delivery of summer forumers asking for all kinds of things in the same manner. Xenophon only stayed a few months on the forums, and Gawain is more come-and-go.

    I stay away from Steam forums and never post unless having serious bugs. That place is badly moderated and has zillions of trolls...
     
    #12
  13. WolfEyes

    WolfEyes Captain

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2018
    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    417
    What is this "bricks" thing? First I have ever heard of it. Clue me in please.
     
    #13
  14. Kassonnade

    Kassonnade Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    May 13, 2017
    Messages:
    2,816
    Likes Received:
    4,111
    A "ship design paradigm"... here is an example I put on a thread some time ago, just to compare two very different playstyles:

    PvPorPvE.png
     
    #14
  15. Brimstone

    Brimstone Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2017
    Messages:
    632
    Likes Received:
    1,980
    The current state of game mechanics don't favor aesthetically designed ships in PvP... basically brick shapes made of multiple layers of combat steel and studded liberally with weapons are the only things that last. But then, it's PvP... only about 15% of the base plays it, so who cares? Most do MP Co-Op or SP at about a 50/50 split with some overlap, like myself
     
    #15
  16. WolfEyes

    WolfEyes Captain

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2018
    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    417
    Oh.

    I thought maybe it was some kind of shout out to the "flying brick" line in Space Cowboys. :oops:
     
    #16
  17. SilvRav

    SilvRav Moderator

    • Moderator
    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2017
    Messages:
    539
    Likes Received:
    882
    Noted. Will leave open for further discussion and will jump over to steam in a bit to check there as well
     
    #17
    The Tactician[ Λ ] likes this.
  18. ravien_ff

    ravien_ff Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2017
    Messages:
    6,422
    Likes Received:
    12,028
    I wish Steam would just get rid of the downvotes. If people like a workshop submission, people can upvote it. Popular items will still be popular, but it prevents certain individuals or groups from downvote bombing perfectly good workshop items.
     
    #18
    WolfEyes, Starwing6 and rucky like this.
  19. The Tactician[ Λ ]

    The Tactician[ Λ ] Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2017
    Messages:
    1,085
    Likes Received:
    3,781
    what im dealing with dayly, ill take Jens advice and ignore it, like i have been but its still annoying
     
    #19
    rucky likes this.
  20. Friendly Timo

    Friendly Timo Captain

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2017
    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    504
    This is pretty much why I always try to remember to mention in my blueprints that they are not meant for PvP. I used to hate it to have comments that mocked me for not covering my CV with, say 8 layers of combat steel and that they were pretty but useless. This is also what led me to secretly wish the the developers would simply get rid of the 3rd person view ability for any PvP playfields. I still humor the idea of people trying to fly and have space combat while having to fly and aim blind from withing their bricks. :D
     
    #20
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page