And your point is what, you just wanted to be a smart arse ? I mean I get why you dont want to see a fair set of questions, because it would hurt your brain to see how many hate the system but why be a shmuck about it ? This thread is disgusting display of false pretense. It utterly stinks of bias in its question set. Its embarrassing in its entirety. Dont even bother with the survey, as its completely pointless, and utterly valueLESS for any data if its not going to have a fair set of answer choices........... I mean do you guys ever SCIENCE at all ? What is that **** ? Taking a **** on your playerbase ? This thread is literally a, suck my balls and respect mar authoritar, thread....... But some of you are to chicken **** to point out this thread is an embarrassment on ALL of us, , allowing Eleon to keep this thread up embarrassing themselves as well , as they look pretty immature if they cant take the truth when THEY are asking the damn question using a system to do so that implies they are looking for a truthful answer......A survey, with bias answers is such an obvious display of immaturity its nothing short of embarrassing for everyone involved, even you dude....... Pathetic beyond belief, how pathetic you ask......... FIVE THOUSAND, THREE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY FIVE people have visited this thread, and a WHOPPING , entire SIXTEEN people have said, yes we will suck your balls and respect your authoritar......... Well played, definitely worth the embarrassment of the survey indeed, but you go ahead and be a smart arse ...... And they say we are the minority ay, 5, 385 people seem to disagree with you 16 folks who seem to think its great....... Damn them numbers are so embarrassing, its a no brainer to entirely delete this thread.....a no brainer......
@piddlefoot I don't see a survey thread, I see a thread where information about the CPU model was given and a question on how much you liked it. This is in no way a survey and shouldn't be seen as one. You therefore shouldn't analyse any results from the views and subsequent votes as a result of a survey. You don't happen to like the cpu system and I can respect that, but you and everyone else should respect the fact there are people who do happen to like it. I have seen enough gaming forums to know that the people who frequent these the most and complain the loudest are those who don't like something. Those who do are busy enjoying the feature. So unless there has been a proper bonafide survey of CPU has been done of which the results have been made known publically, may I kindly and respectfully request you cool it?
That is called a "biased survey" and there were more than 2 threads on CPU, and lots of things have been said that you may not have read, else you would understand why some players are so pissed off with the feature.
Oh I understand fully my friend, I've seen a lot of discussions on it and read many different view points. I simply don't share their views.
You're ok with the fact building blocks require CPU and that inactive devices still consume as much CPU points as when they're full throttle ?
Yup. It's a shame inactive devices cost full CPU sure but I wouldn't call it game breaking and means CPU is useless, needs to be removed and make me go on some kind of rant. An inactive device does cost cpu at this time and if that's the case: Ok, cool...so that's the rules i have to conform to. It's an extremely minor thing at best.
What I see is that many "new" builders are happy to see so many "old" builders (who filled the workshop before the new ones came in) leaving the game because of CPU, so now the new builders have much less competition. Hence the "happy with CPU" bias, because no logical reasons to like restrictions for no sound reason, as you obviously could have read clearly in all the rants against CPU. At a moment where players wished for an extension of the max 250 blocks grid, the CPU came in to say "never going to happen" and point in the other direction. It's even a bit funny to see some newcomers "happy with CPU" yet starting suggestion threads to get the 250 blocks limit to be extended...
Ok, I'm sorry.....but what?! There is no competition and never has been. I simply disagree with you......that's it. It shouldn't be so hard to comprehend.
This is getting a bit too personal, don't you think ? CPU is not a game stopper, we can tweak it in the configs, or simply disable it. But for what sound reason could someone fully understandding inherent limitations that can be derived from proper mass and energy balance can see any kind of usefulness to CPU, after reading all and everything that has been said about it ? Because you read all and everything, like you just mentioned. So you know the objections regarding "CPU is for flight control" and "CPU is for specialization". Once these are out of the picture, what is there to support CPU ?
I'm not the one who started trolling... The simple fact is I happen to like CPU. And there's very little about it I would change, that's all there is to it. You, and dare I say it others, don't seem to recognise that some people happen to like CPU. That....really is all there is to it. When people come on these forums (any forums actually, not just these), and start ranting like Piddlefoot did....it frankly doesn't serve any conversation well no matter what the subject is now does it?
I think you had no real interest in the topic when you told Piddlefoot how to behave, like you're some kind of weekend moderator. He did not even address you. And when asked "why" you provide no answer. I got it from the start, no need to repeat it a dozen times. I gave you some reasons, and there's no denial that the "workshop" is there to showcase player's builds, and most players are proud of what they do (some don't care and some are in the middle ground). There is also no denying that less players posting content = more visibility for the remaining. Doesn't take a genius to see it, and it's quite obvious for anyone who has minimal hindsight on the topic. Now if it's not your case you may stop acting like someone stepped on your toes.
Funny thing about disagreements is there's always two sides (sometimes more....but usually two sides). My opinion on the subject is just as valid as yours. And I've already given you my response, you just can't seem to accept that I like CPU....because I simply like it. If I was asked why do I like chocolate so much I'd answer exactly the same, because I just do.
Then when someone says that this poll is biased and most players wanted nothing of CPU, what is your business telling them that this is in no way a survey ? Did you not read this thread from the start ? Not even going into your "personal taste" trick here, because everybody is forced to eat chocolate now. Sounds fair to you ?
Yes 16 people out of 5,417 like CPU. We get it, to bad Eleon is only taking into account 16 people out of 5,401. Very unfortunate and counterproductive.
That shows Exactly what those arguing against CPU know about how a Counter of VIEWS work... Every time someone Opens this Thread +1, +1, +1.... and so on. 158 Postings here, pro and contra, every time they are drawn here to see what was posted.... THERE are your 5417 VIEWS. Others read it out of interest. Nobody knows how many are only except it or just switch it OFF. (nobody gets FORCED to eat the 'chocolate').
